See the format before you speak to me.

Sample project — created by Canon Consulting. Companies and figures below are fictional and used only to show report structure. In real work, every price and rating is verified against its original source.

Findings

Key findings

This section is written by hand on every report, and it's the part clients actually pay for. On a real engagement it would read like this:

• Two of five publish no pricing at all. Both are the ones chasing commercial contracts. If you publish a starting price, you win the customers who are comparing quickly — and lose the ones who were going to negotiate anyway.
• The price spread is narrow ($115–$140) but the review counts aren't. Review volume, not price, is what separates the top of this set from the bottom.
• Only one offers a recurring plan with locked pricing. That's the clearest open gap in the set, and the cheapest one to test.

Full reports also include a Method section (what was searched, when, and what was excluded) and a Sources list with a live link for every figure in the table.

Sample project — created by Canon Consulting. A deliberately messy fictional customer list, cleaned to show the process. No real customer data appears anywhere on this site.

The delivery note that comes with it

Note the ambiguous rows are flagged, not fixed. Guessing at data you can't verify is how a cleanup job quietly becomes a data-loss job.

Sample project — created by Canon Consulting. Fictional tasks, shown to demonstrate structure.

The live version adds conditional formatting (overdue rows turn red automatically), a status summary at the top, and dropdown validation so the status column can't drift into six different spellings of "done."